Integrity

Alaska’s State judges are selected based on their professional qualifications, not political campaigns. Alaska’s process for selecting judges is rigorous. Here is what they face in this process to ensure we have the best judiciary in the nation:

  1. Written Application. Applicants submit a 28 page written application and list of references to the Alaska Judicial Council (AJC), a nonpartisan group consisting of three members of the public, three members of the Alaska Bar Association, and the Chief Justice of the Alaska Supreme Court.
  2. Professional Surveys. On behalf of the AJC an independent contractor sends detailed questionnaires to all active members of the Alaska Bar, which includes judges, asking them to rate the applicant based on the following criteria:
    1. Professional competence
    2. Integrity
    3. Judicial temperament
    4. Fairness
    5. Experience
    6. Overall professional qualifications
  3. References and Background Check. The AJC contacts Present and Past employers, calls the applicant’s general character references, and sends detailed questionnaires to each of the attorneys and judges who have been involved in cases with the applicant, asking about the applicant’s suitability for nomination as a judge. The information gathered includes:
    • Type of law practice
    • Criminal, judicial or Alaska Bar disciplinary history
    • Community service
    • Any public or political office previously held
  4. Public Comments. Public testimony is collected via writing, website submission, and public hearings.
  5. Interview. The applicant is interviewed by members of the AJC to further review the findings of surveys and public comments.
  6. Evaluation and Nomination. The AJC reviews the information gathered, evaluating:
    • professional competence
    • diligence
    • administrative skills
    • integrity
    • fairness
    • temperament
    • demonstrated commitment to public and community service
    • life experience
    • judgment/common sense
    • demonstrated commitment to equal justice and legal needs of diverse communities in Alaska.

    The AJC is prohibited from considering religious or political beliefs, anonymous comments or the likelihood of appointment by the governor. After this thorough evaluation and consideration, the Council nominates a select number of the most highly qualified applicants for consideration by the Governor.

  7. Selection by the Governor. The Governor appoints a judge chosen from the top applicants.
  8. Public Retention Vote. After serving a few years as a judge, the public votes on whether the judge can keep serving Alaskans. This is the judicial retention process.

The delegates’ goal in focusing on merit evaluation of judicial applicants was to ensure that 'the judicial council will seek for the best available timber.'

Statement of Constitutional Convention Delegate Ralph Rivers

Any attempt to put personal beliefs ahead of the law undercuts the effectiveness of the Judiciary as a whole... [Judicial independence] also requires freedom from outside influence or political intimidation...Courts are not established to follow opinion polls or to try to discern the will of the people at any given time but rather are to uphold the law....This independence is not established for the benefit of the judges, but rather for all of us; it is the citizens who are the intended beneficiaries of fair and impartial administration of justice consistent with the rule of law....Only judges who are insulated from outside intimidation and pressure can fairly administer justice and be perceived to be doing so.

Chief Justice Michael Wolff of Missouriin his 2006 State of the Judiciary address, The Missouri Bar, Vol. 62, No. 2, March-April 2006
Sign up for the newsletter